[Pause here while you wipe the laughter from your eyes.]
Let's face it. They are putting them behind a wall for the same reason that the Globe and Mail put their columnists behind a subscription requirement (the ONLY part of the paper behind the wall) -- to protect their columnists' fragile egos. And reputations.
Business Week doesn't believe the $49.95 for Paul Krugman model will work.
It's true consumers are willing to pay more for certain media offerings. (Consider today's cable bill vs. 1995's, or the costs of broadband vs. dial-up.) But one key market perversity is that this dynamic does not apply to print. Financial analysts find a growing dependence of leading papers -- including the Times -- on discounted subscriptions.Face it. The New Yawk Times just doesn't like their columnists to be ridiculed.
1 comment:
If you are willing to wait a day or so, you'll find NYT columnists syndicated elsewhere on the web legally and for free. Here is Frank Rich's column of 9/18/05:
http://jaysoundsoff.blogspot.com/2005/09/frank-rich-courtesy-of-taiwan-news.html
Post a Comment